Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Documents feature prominently in all manner of business and personal affairs. Almost any type of document may become disputed in an investigation or litigation. For example, a questioned document may be a sheet of paper bearing handwriting or mechanically-produced text such as a ransom note, a forged cheque, or a business contract.
The following is an incomplete list of examples where courts used the Four Corners Doctrine while interpreting the disputed-document: From the four corners of the document: as derived from the text of the agreement itself, without relying upon other resources or witnesses.
During the last week of August, Mapes asked Josh Howard, her immediate superior at CBS, for permission to facilitate contact between Burkett and the Kerry campaign; Howard and Mapes subsequently disputed whether such permission had been given. [27] Two documents were provided by Burkett to Mapes on September 2 and four others on September 5, 2004.
COMPLETE, SIGN, AND RETURN THIS LEGAL DISPUTE FORM AND EXPECT TO HEAR BACK FROM US WITHIN 60 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF COMPLETED FORM. MAIL the form to Oath Inc., Dept. 5771, PO BOX 65101, Sterling, VA, 20165-8806. You may receive a call from an Oath Legal Representative at the phone number below to discuss your dispute.
Both the person accused of the crime and the accuser would give speeches based on their sides of the story. The case would be decided in favor of the individual with the best argument and delivery. This origin is the source of the two modern usages of the word forensic—as a form of legal evidence; and as a category of public presentation. [6]
Document review (also known as doc review), in the context of legal proceedings, is the process whereby each party to a case sorts through and analyzes the documents and data they possess (and later the documents and data supplied by their opponents through discovery) to determine which are sensitive or otherwise relevant to the case. [1]
In a legal dispute, one party is initially presumed to be correct and gets the benefit of the doubt, while the other side bears the burden of proof. When a party bearing the burden of proof meets their burden, the burden of proof switches to the other side. Burdens may be of different kinds for each party, in different phases of litigation.
During the Killian documents controversy in 2004, the authenticity of the documents themselves was disputed by a variety of individuals and groups. Proof of authenticity is not possible without original documents, and since CBS used only faxed and photocopied duplicates, authentication to professional standards would be impossible regardless of the provenance of the originals.