Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Case name Citation Date Subject January 7, 2000 - Appointment of Beverley McLachlin as Chief Justice of Canada: Arsenault-Cameron v Prince Edward Island [2000] 1 S.C.R. 3, 2000 SCC 1 January 13, 2000 language rights Reference re Firearms Act [2000] 1 S.C.R. 783, 2000 SCC 31 June 15, 2000 Criminal law power Lovelace v Ontario
Hearing: December 10, 2010 Judgment: July 15, 2011; Full case name: Canada Trustco Mortgage Company v. Her Majesty The Queen: Citations: 2011 SCC 36, [2011] 2 S.C.R. 635: Docket No. 33422 [1] Prior history: Judgment for the Crown in the Federal Court of Appeal, affirming a decision of the Tax Court of Canada. Ruling: Appeal allowed. Holding
The bank officials sanctioned large-scale corporate loans to realty developers, overriding mandatory conditions for such approvals along with other irregularities. [1] The Central Bureau of investigation arrested number of high official from the several financial institutes in India in connection with the housing scam in 24 November 2010.
At least one judge in a case involving her documents has recognized the conflict of interest inherent in a law firm assigning the property of one entity, presumably its client, to another entity ...
You don't often hear about the bank perpetrating the fraud. Until now. Ally Financial's home loan unit, GMAC Mortgage, has a 13-person team dedicated to processing and signing all the foreclosure ...
Was the financial crisis caused by "systemic failure" or mortgage fraud? Or a combination of the two? And why are so many American homeowners still paying the price?
[20] [21] Since the 2010 crisis, 62 million mortgages are held in the name of MERS, [22] and MERS has initiated thousands of foreclosures in the United States, claiming to be the mortgagee of record. Lawyers have contended in court that MERS has no legal right to initiate a foreclosure, because MERS does not own the loans in question.
The Supreme Court of Canada is the court of last resort and final appeal in Canada. Cases successfully appealed to the Court are generally of national importance. Once a case is decided, the Court publishes written reasons for the decision, that consist of one or more opinions from any number of the nine justices.