enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Hearing set for Oct. 31 on alleged misconduct in Walmart ...

    www.aol.com/live-updates-judge-orders-el...

    A Thursday, Oct. 31, hearing is set to address allegations of prosecutorial misconduct that could result in the death penalty being removed as a punishment for the Walmart mass shooter. Judge Sam ...

  3. California inmate on death row for 33 years must either be ...

    www.aol.com/news/california-inmate-death-row-33...

    Last year Price initiated an investigation into potential prosecutorial misconduct during jury selection in the case of Ernest Dykes, who was found guilty in 1993 of shooting a 9-year-old.

  4. Allegations of prosecutorial misconduct emerge in two federal ...

    www.aol.com/news/allegations-prosecutorial...

    Jan. 25—CONCORD — A federal judge in New Hampshire has dismissed one criminal case, and a high-profile white-collar case hangs in the balance over questions about misconduct by a top federal ...

  5. Connick v. Thompson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connick_v._Thompson

    Ginsburg, joined by Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan. Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. 51 (2011), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court considered whether a prosecutor's office can be held liable for a single Brady violation by one of its members on the theory that the office provided inadequate training.

  6. Prosecutorial misconduct - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosecutorial_misconduct

    Prosecutorial misconduct. In jurisprudence, prosecutorial misconduct or prosecutorial overreach is "an illegal act or failing to act, on the part of a prosecutor, especially an attempt to sway the jury to wrongly convict a defendant or to impose a harsher than appropriate punishment." [1] It is similar to selective prosecution.

  7. Prosecutorial vindictiveness - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosecutorial_vindictiveness

    Prosecutorial vindictiveness occurs where a prosecutor retaliates against a defendant for exercising a constitutional or statutory right by increasing the number or severity of the charges against him. [1][2] The United States Supreme Court has held prosecutorial vindictiveness to constitute a violation of a defendant's right to due process. [3][4]

  8. Sotomayor Is Right: The Supreme Court Should Reevaluate ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/sotomayor-supreme-court...

    The doctrine makes it nearly impossible for victims of prosecutorial misconduct to get recourse. Sotomayor Is Right: The Supreme Court Should Reevaluate Absolute Immunity for Prosecutors Skip to ...

  9. Brady v. Maryland - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brady_v._Maryland

    Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that under the Due Process Clause of the Constitution of the United States, the prosecution must turn over to a criminal defendant any significant evidence in its possession that suggests the defendant is not guilty (exculpatory evidence).