Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In 2017, a class action lawsuit was filed on behalf of thousands of Uber drivers, alleging that Uber’s “upfront prices” policy did not provide drivers with the 80% of fares to which they were entitled. The lawsuit was settled for $345,622, with each driver in the class getting at least $20. [39] [40] [41]
California Supreme Court rules Uber driver whose contract required him to take disputes to arbitration could represent his peers in class-action suit. California Supreme Court upholds Uber workers ...
Now Uber will pay $290 million and Lyft $38 million into two separate settlement funds, which will be distributed to current and former drivers of the companies.
The Supreme Court refuses to shield Uber and Lyft from California state labor lawsuits that seek back pay for tens of thousands of drivers. ... Apple fights $1.8 billion App Store lawsuit in first ...
Uber Technologies Inc v Heller, 2020 SCC 16, is a 2020 decision of the Supreme Court of Canada. The Court held 8–1 that an arbitration clause in a contract the plaintiff David Heller had signed with Uber was unconscionable, and hence unenforceable. As a result, it held that Heller's proposed class action lawsuit against Uber could go forward.
Uber and Lyft in June agreed to adopt a $32.50 hourly minimum pay standard for Massachusetts drivers and pay $175 million to settle a lawsuit by the Democratic-led state's attorney general ...
In the United States, drivers do not have any control over the fares they charge. A lawsuit filed in California, Gill et al. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al., alleged that this is a violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890. The lawsuit was denied class action status; a judge forced each plaintiff to go to arbitration individually. The ...
More than 100,000 current and former Uber and Lyft drivers statewide could see more money in their pockets. Two settlements totaling $328 million — $290 million from Uber and $38 million from ...