enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Fallacy of composition - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy_of_composition

    The fallacy of composition is an informal fallacy that arises when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole. A trivial example might be: "This tire is made of rubber; therefore, the vehicle of which it is a part is also made of rubber."

  3. Category:Inductive fallacies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Inductive_fallacies

    Print/export Download as PDF; Printable version; In other projects Wikidata item; ... Fallacy of composition; Confirmation bias; Counterinduction; F.

  4. Category:Verbal fallacies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Verbal_fallacies

    Download as PDF; Printable version; In other projects ... Fallacy of composition; D. Descriptive fallacy; Fallacy of division; E.

  5. Informal fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Informal_fallacy

    The fallacy of division is committed if one infers from the sentence in the collective sense that one specific individual is strong enough. [12] [24] The fallacy of composition is committed if one infers from the fact that each member of a group has a property that the group as a whole has this property. [24]

  6. List of fallacies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

    Naturalistic fallacy fallacy is a type of argument from fallacy. Straw man fallacy – refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction. [110] Texas sharpshooter fallacy – improperly asserting a cause to explain a cluster of data. [111]

  7. Fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy

    Boudry coined the term fallacy fork. [27] For a given fallacy, one must either characterize it by means of a deductive argumentation scheme, which rarely applies (the first prong of the fork), or one must relax definitions and add nuance to take the actual intent and context of the argument into account (the other prong of the fork). [27]

  8. Glossary of logic - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_logic

    A fallacy in argumentation that targets the person making an argument rather than the argument itself. ad ignorantium A logical fallacy where a proposition is considered true because it has not been proven false or vice versa. ad infinitum An argument or process that is supposed to continue indefinitely, without ever reaching an end or conclusion.

  9. Sophistical Refutations - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophistical_Refutations

    The fallacies Aristotle identifies in Chapter 4 (formal fallacies) and 5 (informal fallacies) of this book are the following: Fallacies in the language or formal fallacies (in dictionem):