Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Michael Stifel published the following method in 1544. [3] [4] Consider the sequence of mixed numbers,,,, … with = + +.To calculate a Pythagorean triple, take any term of this sequence and convert it to an improper fraction (for mixed number , the corresponding improper fraction is ).
If () is the generating function of the sequence of Betti numbers () of a space Z, then p X × Y ( t ) = p X ( t ) p Y ( t ) . {\displaystyle p_{X\times Y}(t)=p_{X}(t)p_{Y}(t).} Here when there are finitely many Betti numbers of X and Y , each of which is a natural number rather than ∞ {\displaystyle \infty } , this reads as an identity on ...
A two-sum formula can be obtained using one of the symmetric formulae for Stirling numbers in conjunction with the explicit formula for Stirling numbers of the second kind. [ n k ] = ∑ j = n 2 n − k ( j − 1 k − 1 ) ( 2 n − k j ) ∑ m = 0 j − n ( − 1 ) m + n − k m j − k m !
Illustration of the filling of the unit interval (horizontal axis) using the first n terms of the decimal Van der Corput sequence, for n from 0 to 999 (vertical axis). A van der Corput sequence is an example of the simplest one-dimensional low-discrepancy sequence over the unit interval; it was first described in 1935 by the Dutch mathematician J. G. van der Corput.
Proof without words of the arithmetic progression formulas using a rotated copy of the blocks. An arithmetic progression or arithmetic sequence is a sequence of numbers such that the difference from any succeeding term to its preceding term remains constant throughout the sequence. The constant difference is called common difference of that ...
See also generating function transformations for Bell polynomial generating function expansions of compositions of sequence generating functions and powers, logarithms, and exponentials of a sequence generating function. Each of these formulas is cited in the respective sections of Comtet.
Each of the Renard sequences can be reduced to a subset by taking every nth value in a series, which is designated by adding the number n after a slash. [4] For example, "R10″/3 (1…1000)" designates a series consisting of every third value in the R″10 series from 1 to 1000, that is, 1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 30, 60, 120, 250, 500, 1000.
However, does not hold, because N is defined in terms of the sequence (X n) n∈. Intuitively, one might expect to have E[S N] > 0 in this example, because the summation stops right after a one, thereby apparently creating a positive bias. However, Wald's equation shows that this intuition is misleading.