enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Template:Predatory publisher - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Predatory_publisher

    This template is placed after a reference to a predatory journal. It identifies it as an unreliable source . Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox ( create | mirror ) and testcases ( create ) pages.

  3. List of scholarly publishing stings - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scholarly...

    The article, in fact written a decade earlier by David Mazières and Eddie Kohler, was titled "Get me off your fucking mailing list" and consisted of the phrase "Get me off your fucking mailing list" being repeated for the entirety of the article body. The journal requested the researcher to "add some more recent references and do a bit of ...

  4. Predatory publishing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predatory_publishing

    Various journal review websites (crowd-sourced or expert-run) have been started, some focusing on the quality of the peer review process and extending to non-OA publications. [127] [128] A group of libraries and publishers launched an awareness campaign. [129] [130] A number of measures have been suggested to further combat predatory journals.

  5. Beall's List - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beall's_List

    They stated that "the criteria he uses for his list are an excellent starting point for thinking about the hallmarks of predatory publishers and journals", [30] and suggested that "given the fuzziness between low-quality and predatory publishers, whitelisting, or listing publishers and journals that have been vetted and verified as satisfying ...

  6. Who's Afraid of Peer Review? - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who's_Afraid_of_Peer_Review?

    The peer review provided by PLOS ONE was reported to be the most rigorous of all, and it was the only journal that identified the paper's ethical problems, for example the lack of documentation of how animals were treated in the creation of the cancer cell lines. [2]

  7. Scientific misconduct - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_misconduct

    Publishing in a predatory journal, knowingly or unknowingly, was discussed as a form of potential scientific misconduct. [26] [27] The peer-review process can have limitations when considering research outside the conventional scientific paradigm: social factors such as "groupthink" can interfere with open and fair deliberation of new research ...

  8. AOL

    search.aol.com

    The search engine that helps you find exactly what you're looking for. Find the most relevant information, video, images, and answers from all across the Web.

  9. Template:Predatory open access source list - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Predatory_open...

    This template holds a list of predatory open access journals and publishers for MediaWiki:Abusefilter-warning-predatory, so that it can be edited by non-administrators. It should always be kept synchronized with Special:AbuseFilter/891.