enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Trade group efforts against file sharing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trade_group_efforts...

    The RIAA still reserves the right to file lawsuits against 'particularly flagrant' offenders, but the article predicted these lawsuits would "slow to a trickle." [92] The RIAA has stated on their website that the intention of the lawsuit program was to bring awareness to the illegality of file-sharing. [93]

  3. Capitol Records, Inc. v. Foster - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitol_Records,_Inc._v...

    Capitol Records, Inc. v. Foster, 5:04-cv-01569 (W.D. Okla. 2006), is a notable case involving intellectual property and file sharing/distribution of music. The case involves the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) filing a lawsuit against an Oklahoma woman, Deborah Foster, in November 2004.

  4. Arista Records LLC v. Lime Group LLC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arista_Records_LLC_v._Lime...

    As the litigation continued, the parties consented to a permanent injunction on 26 October 2010 shutting down the LimeWire file-sharing service. [16] The permanent injunction prohibits LimeWire from copying, reproducing, downloading, or distributing a sound recording, as well as directly or indirectly enabling or assisting any user to use the LimeWire system to copy, reproduce or distribute ...

  5. Recording Industry Association of America - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recording_Industry...

    RIAA opposes unauthorized sharing of its members' music. Studies conducted since the association began its campaign against peer-to-peer file-sharing have concluded that losses incurred per download range from negligible [27] [28] to moderate. [29] The association has commenced high-profile lawsuits against file-sharing service providers.

  6. Sony BMG v. Tenenbaum - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_BMG_v._Tenenbaum

    In the June 2008 hearing, when discussing Tenenbaum's need for a lawyer, Gertner expressed dismay at the plaintiffs' tactics in the over 133 file-sharing cases heard in her court at that point: [7] There is a huge imbalance in these cases. The record companies are represented by large lawfirms with substantial resources.

  7. Elektra v. Santangelo - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elektra_v._Santangelo

    The RIAA contends that illegally shared files were found on a computer with an IP address connected to Ms. Santangelo, and that this is sufficient grounds for continuing to pursue the lawsuit. In a CNN American Morning interview, Miles O'Brien discussed the case with Ms. Santangelo and RIAA President Cary Sherman. [8]

  8. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A&M_Records,_Inc._v...

    This was the first major case to address the application of copyright laws to peer-to-peer file sharing. [2] While A&M Records served as the lead plaintiff, Napster was sued by 18 different record companies, all of which were members of the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA). [3]

  9. Capitol Records, Inc. v. Thomas-Rasset - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitol_Records,_Inc._v...

    Capitol Records, Inc. v. Thomas-Rasset was the first file-sharing copyright infringement lawsuit in the United States brought by major record labels to be tried before a jury. The defendant, Jammie Thomas-Rasset, was found liable to the plaintiff record company for making 24 songs available to the public for free on the Kazaa file sharing ...