Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 603 U.S. 799 (2024), is a United States Supreme Court case about the statute of limitations for judicial review of federal agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act. The legal question under review was whether a challenge to the validity of a rule must be ...
The judgments are vacated, and the cases are remanded, because neither the Eleventh Circuit nor the Fifth Circuit conducted a proper analysis of the facial First Amendment challenges to Florida and Texas laws regulating large internet platforms. Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System: 22–1008: July 1, 2024
The Supreme Court in 2015 left in place a lower court's ruling backing the regulation. Corner Post in its 2021 lawsuit argued that the rule defied congressional intent and was "arbitrary and ...
The Supreme Court accepted the petition and heard the case on February 19, 2019. The Court issued its decision on June 10, 2019, reversing and remanding the Federal Appeals Court decision. Justice Sotomayor, writing for the 6-3 majority, stated that the Leahy-Smith Act does not prescribe any language that the government can be considered a ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate
“The Supreme Court just honestly does not like to rule on elections,” said Ameshia Cross, Democratic strategist. Former President Donald […] The post Supreme Court ruling to keep Trump on ...
The Supreme Court this week announced it is taking up a case that, although it hasn’t grabbed nearly as many headlines as some of its recent high-profile rulings, could have a profound impact on ...
NRDC won the case in a federal court, but the Supreme Court overturned that decision and ruled in favor of Chevron on the grounds that the courts should broadly defer to EPA and other independent regulatory agencies. Chevron was one of the most important decisions in U.S. administrative law and was cited in thousands of cases. [4]