Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Communication usually happens between distinct entities. Intrapersonal communication is an exception where the same person acts as source and receiver. [15] Berlo discusses several aspects of sender and receiver that affect communication. He organizes them into four categories: communication skills, attitudes, knowledge, and social-cultural ...
Not a systematic theory about persuasive communications, this approach is a general framework within which research was conducted. The Yale researchers did not specify levels of importance among the factors of a persuasive message; they emphasized analyzing the aspects of attitude change over comparing them. [3]
Communication is not an individual experience it is an inherently social phenomenon. [5] [23] Meaning is an ongoing, updating, and always social process. Premise 4 is that the agent of action (both human and non-human) remains an open question. CCO theory embraces the ability of artifacts to shape the actions of members of the organization.
Communication theories vary substantially in their epistemology, and articulating this philosophical commitment is part of the theorizing process. [1] Although the various epistemic positions used in communication theories can vary, one categorization scheme distinguishes among interpretive empirical, metric empirical or post-positivist, rhetorical, and critical epistemologies. [13]
Social constructionism is a term used in sociology, social ontology, and communication theory.The term can serve somewhat different functions in each field; however, the foundation of this theoretical framework suggests various facets of social reality—such as concepts, beliefs, norms, and values—are formed through continuous interactions and negotiations among society's members, rather ...
Norm cascade: When a norm has broad acceptance and reaches a tipping point, with norm leaders pressuring others to adopt and adhere to the norm. Norm internalization: When the norm has acquired a "taken-for-granted" quality where compliance with the norm is nearly automatic. They argue that several factors may raise the influence of certain ...
Communication theorist Robert Craig sees the difference in the fact that models primarily represent communication while theories additionally explain it. [12] According to Frank Dance, there is no one fully comprehensive model of communication since each one highlights only certain aspects and distorts others.
Since the introduction of co-cultural theory in "Laying the foundation for co-cultural communication theory: An inductive approach to studying "non-dominant" communication strategies and the factors that influence them" (1996), Orbe has published two works describing the theory and its use as well as several studies on communication patterns and strategies based on different co-cultural groups.