Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
There are many ways to measure biodiversity within a given ecosystem. However, the two most popular are Shannon-Weaver diversity index, [4] commonly referred to as Shannon diversity index, and the other is Simpsons diversity index. [5] Although many scientists prefer to use Shannon's diversity index simply because it takes into account species ...
The observed species richness is affected not only by the number of individuals but also by the heterogeneity of the sample. If individuals are drawn from different environmental conditions (or different habitats), the species richness of the resulting set can be expected to be higher than if all individuals are drawn from similar environments.
In ecology, local abundance is the relative representation of a species in a particular ecosystem. [1] It is usually measured as the number of individuals found per sample . The ratio of abundance of one species to one or multiple other species living in an ecosystem is referred to as relative species abundances . [ 1 ]
Species richness, or biodiversity, increases from the poles to the tropics for a wide variety of terrestrial and marine organisms, often referred to as the latitudinal diversity gradient. [1] The latitudinal diversity gradient is one of the most widely recognized patterns in ecology. [1] It has been observed to varying degrees in Earth's past. [2]
abundance class 1 1-2 2-4 4-8 8-16 species 5 0 1.5 1.5 1 The three species of abundance four thus appear, 1.5 in abundance class 2–4, and 1.5 in 4–8. The above method of analysis cannot account for species that are unsampled: that is, species sufficiently rare to have been recorded zero times.
It overcomes the shortcomings of biodiversity indices that cannot display the relative role different variables played in their calculation. The curve is a 2D chart with relative abundance on the Y-axis and the abundance rank on the X-axis. X-axis: The abundance rank. The most abundant species is given rank 1, the second most abundant is 2 and ...
Larger areas tend to contain larger numbers of species, and empirically, the relative numbers seem to follow systematic mathematical relationships. [1] The species–area relationship is usually constructed for a single type of organism, such as all vascular plants or all species of a specific trophic level within a particular site.
The technique of rarefaction was developed in 1968 by Howard Sanders in a biodiversity assay of marine benthic ecosystems, as he sought a model for diversity that would allow him to compare species richness data among sets with different sample sizes; he developed rarefaction curves as a method to compare the shape of a curve rather than absolute numbers of species.