Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
However, parser generators for context-free grammars often support the ability for user-written code to introduce limited amounts of context-sensitivity. (For example, upon encountering a variable declaration, user-written code could save the name and type of the variable into an external data structure, so that these could be checked against ...
Rust: C2Rust takes C code as input and outputs unsafe Rust code, focusing on preserving compatibility with the original codebase. Several documented limitations exist for this process. Converting the resulting code to safe and idiomatic Rust code is a manual effort post translation, although an automated tool exists to ease this task. [65]
It was while working in a Detroit body shop that Ziebart saw the effects of rust and began looking for a way to protect cars against it. That is when he developed the process to rust proof automobiles. The process is often called "Ziebart-ing" or "Ziebart-ed", the generic term for rustproofing. [3] [4]
The German-born American Kurt Ziebart was the inventor of the rustproofing process for automobiles. [5] It was while working in a Packard body shop in Detroit that Ziebart saw the effects of rust and began looking for a way to protect cars against it.
Dynamic binary translation (DBT) looks at a short sequence of code—typically on the order of a single basic block—then translates it and caches the resulting sequence. Code is only translated as it is discovered and when possible, and branch instructions are made to point to already translated and saved code ( memoization ).
Object code only needs to be created once when compiling source code. There are clear disadvantages when translating high-level code with a compiler. [7] This image represents the translation process through a compiler. Object code produced during compilation is specific to a machine's instruction set architecture (ISA). This results in object ...
A typical way for lay people to assess machine translation quality is to translate from a source language to a target language and back to the source language with the same engine. Though intuitively this may seem like a good method of evaluation, it has been shown that round-trip translation is a "poor predictor of quality". [1]
Computer-assisted translation is a broad and imprecise term covering a range of tools. These can include: Translation memory tools (TM tools), consisting of a database of text segments in a source language and their translations in one or more target languages. [2]