Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In July 1999, Abrams sought the requisite conditional use permit, but his neighbors provided strong opposition. In August 2000, Abrams filled action against Rancho Palos Verdes in the District Court for the Central District of California , alleging that the denial of the conditional use permit violated the limitations placed on the city's ...
Within an ordinance is a list of land use designations commonly known as zoning. Each different type of zone has its own set of allowed uses. These are known as by-right uses. Then there is an extra set of uses known as special uses. To build a use that is listed as a special use, a special-use permit (or conditional-use permit) must be obtained.
Sheetz v. County of El Dorado (Docket No. 22-1074) is a United States Supreme Court case regarding permit exactions under the Takings Clause.The Supreme Court held, in a unanimous opinion by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, that fees for land-use permits must be closely related and roughly proportional to the effects of the land use – the test established by Nollan v.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and its California counterpart on Tuesday took legal action to block two 2023 state corporate climate accountability laws from going into effect.
The measure also requires porn production companies to obtain a health permit prior to production and to post the permit and a notice to performers regarding condom use during production. All individuals involved will also be required to pay $1,600 every 2 years. [1] The measure was put to the voters in November 2012 and passed with 57% of the ...
Amazon. Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) is another AI frontrunner that could make noise in 2025.Shares of the e-commerce giant are actually a top internet pick over at Citi despite gaining nearly 50% in 2024 ...
Federal and state officials in California last month announced new rules for operating two water delivery systems, the outlet reported at the time. The rules apply to two projects carrying water ...
Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District, 570 U.S. 595 (2013), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that land-use agencies imposing conditions on the issuance of development permits must comply with the "nexus" and "rough proportionality" standards of Nollan v. California Coastal Commission and Dolan v.