Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In American law, the unitary executive theory is a Constitutional law theory according to which the President of the United States has sole authority over the executive branch. [1] It is "an expansive interpretation of presidential power that aims to centralize greater control over the government in the White House". [2]
Emergency presidential power is not a new idea. However, the way in which it is used in the twenty-first century presents new challenges. [54] A claim of emergency powers was at the center of President Abraham Lincoln's suspension of habeas corpus without Congressional approval in 1861. Lincoln claimed that the rebellion created an emergency ...
Executive privilege is the right of the president of the United States and other members of the executive branch to maintain confidential communications under certain circumstances within the executive branch and to resist some subpoenas and other oversight by the legislative and judicial branches of government in pursuit of particular information or personnel relating to those confidential ...
Article Two of the United States Constitution establishes the executive branch of the federal government, which carries out and enforces federal laws.Article Two vests the power of the executive branch in the office of the President of the United States, lays out the procedures for electing and removing the President, and establishes the President's powers and responsibilities.
The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the ...
Under this theory, first articulated in 1793 by Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton, [1] the authority of the president extends to all decisions and acts of the United States as a sovereign state that are not exclusively vested elsewhere. The limits of such inherent powers were articulated in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer. This ...
The executive power theory stated that the President would have the power to remove executive officers unilaterally. The theory argued that because executive power was vested in the President under the Vesting Clause, and since removals of executive officials are executive functions, removal powers would fall under the authority of the President.
In the case of the former, the president retains the power to veto such a decision; however, Congress may override a veto with a two-thirds majority to end an executive order. It has been argued that a congressional override of an executive order is a nearly impossible event, because of the supermajority vote required, and the fact that such a ...