Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A false affordance is an apparent affordance that does not have any real function, meaning that the actor perceives possibilities for action that are nonexistent. [19] A good example of a false affordance is a placebo button. [20] Affordance is said to be hidden when there are possibilities for action, but these are not perceived by the actor ...
The term affordance is first used in human-computer interaction in the 1980s by Norman with the term perceived affordance. [10] Relevant publications were: Gaver's seminal articles on technology affordance in 1991, [11] affordances of media spaces in 1992, [12] affordances for interaction, [13] and then Bradner's notion of social affordance, [14] where social affordances are action ...
Some examples of boundary objects in CSCW research are: Electronic health records, which pass health information between groups with different priorities (such as doctors, nurses, and medical secretaries). [28] The concept of a "digital work environment", as used in Swedish political debate. [29]
In the book, Norman introduced the term affordance as it applied to design, [3]: 282 borrowing James J. Gibson's concept from ecological psychology. [1] In the revised edition of his book in 2013, he also introduced the concept of signifiers to clarify his definition of affordances. [4] Examples of affordances are doors that can be pushed or ...
Gibson did work on perception with his wife, Eleanor J Gibson. Together they proposed perceptual learning as a process of seeing the differences in the perceptual field around an individual. An early example of this is the classic research study done by Eleanor Gibson and R. D. Walk, the visual cliff experiment. In this experiment an infant ...
The cell phone is an example of the social shaping of technology (Zulto 2009). The cell phone has evolved over the years to make our lives easier by providing people with handheld computers that can answer calls, answer emails, search for information, and complete numerous other tasks (Zulto, 2009).
However, it has been increasingly subject to critical review by scholars. For example, scholar Raymond Williams, criticizes media determinism and rather believes social movements define technological and media processes. [28] With regard to communications media, audience determinism is a viewpoint opposed to media determinism.
Two major groups of multimodal interfaces have merged, one concerned in alternate input methods and the other in combined input/output. The first group of interfaces combined various user input modes beyond the traditional keyboard and mouse input/output, such as speech, pen, touch, manual gestures, [21] gaze and head and body movements. [22]