Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrix is an approach to examining construct validity developed by Campbell and Fiske (1959). [1] It organizes convergent and discriminant validity evidence for comparison of how a measure relates to other measures.
(R) score 1 when subject returns inkblot to examiner without giving a scorable response; otherwise score 0 3: Location (L) tendency to break down blot into smaller fragments. score 0=use of whole blot, 1=large area, 2=smaller area 4: Space (S) score 1=true figure-ground reversals; score 0 otherwise 5: Form Definiteness (FD)
Validity is the main extent to which a concept, conclusion, or measurement is well-founded and likely corresponds accurately to the real world. [1] [2] The word "valid" is derived from the Latin validus, meaning strong.
Lilliefors test is a normality test based on the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test.It is used to test the null hypothesis that data come from a normally distributed population, when the null hypothesis does not specify which normal distribution; i.e., it does not specify the expected value and variance of the distribution. [1]
Convergent validity in the behavioral sciences refers to the degree to which two measures that theoretically should be related, are in fact related. [1] Convergent validity, along with discriminant validity, is a subtype of construct validity.
The report similarly examined questions of test bias (finding some bias in favor of Blacks), validity (finding lower validity, average r = .25 to .35, than reported elsewhere, and that this was primarily due to methodological differences).
Teens aren't just sneaking quick glances at their phones during class.They're spending an average of 1.5 hours on them every school day, with 25% of students logging on for more than two hours ...
In statistics, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is a special form of factor analysis, most commonly used in social science research. [1] It is used to test whether measures of a construct are consistent with a researcher's understanding of the nature of that construct (or factor).