enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritor_Savings_Bank_v._Vinson

    Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986), is a US labor law case, where the United States Supreme Court, in a 9–0 decision, recognized sexual harassment as a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The case was the first of its kind to reach the Supreme Court and would redefine sexual harassment in the workplace. [1] [2]

  3. O'Connor v. Ortega - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O'Connor_v._Ortega

    O'Connor v. Ortega, 480 U.S. 709 (1987), is a United States Supreme Court decision on the Fourth Amendment rights of government employees with regard to administrative searches in the workplace, during investigations by supervisors for violations of employee policy rather than by law enforcement for criminal offenses.

  4. Tortious interference - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tortious_interference

    A tort of negligent interference occurs when one party's negligence damages the contractual or business relationship between others, causing economic harm, such as by blocking a waterway or causing a blackout that prevents the utility company from being able to uphold its existing contracts with consumers.

  5. Economic torts in English law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_torts_in_English_law

    Economic torts protect people from interference with their trade or business. The area includes the doctrine of restraint of trade and has largely been submerged in the twentieth century by statutory interventions on collective labour law, modern antitrust or competition law, and certain laws governing intellectual property, particularly unfair competition law.

  6. Skidmore v. Swift & Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skidmore_v._Swift_&_Co.

    Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134 (1944), is a United States Supreme Court decision holding that an administrative agency's interpretative rules deserve deference according to their persuasiveness.

  7. Paul McCartney Says Yoko Ono Was a Workplace 'Interference ...

    www.aol.com/entertainment/paul-mccartney-says...

    Paul McCartney, Yoko Ono Getty Images(2) Paul McCartney is sharing how he really felt about Yoko Ono’s presence in some of The Beatles’ last recording sessions as a band. During a recent ...

  8. Ricci v. DeStefano - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricci_v._DeStefano

    Ricci v. DeStefano, 557 U.S. 557 (2009), is a United States labor law case of the United States Supreme Court on unlawful discrimination through disparate impact under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

  9. Work–family conflict - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work–family_conflict

    Conflict between work and family is bi-directional.There is a distinction between what is termed work-to-family conflict and what is termed family-to-work conflict. [3]Work-to-family conflict occurs when experiences and commitments at work interfere with family life, such as extensive, irregular, or inflexible work hours, work overload and other forms of job stress, interpersonal conflict at ...