Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc., 564 U.S. 552 (2011), [1] is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a Vermont statute that restricted the sale, disclosure, and use of records that revealed the prescribing practices of individual doctors violated the First Amendment.
In no other case had the Board of Regents overruled the Commissioner's recommendation. [5] The hospital also admitted it had provided inadequate care and paid a $13,000 fine to the state. [17] In 1991, however, the state's appeals court completely cleared the records of the two doctors of findings that they had provided inadequate care to Zion ...
Within 48 hours of being put on Paxil Schell killed his wife, daughter, infant granddaughter, and himself. Tim Tobin, Schell's son-in-law, took legal action against SmithKline (now GlaxoSmithKline). The Tobin case was heard in Wyoming from May 21 to June 6, 2001. The jury returned a guilty verdict against SmithKline and awarded Tobin $6.4 million.
United States Medical Licensing Examination; Acronym: USMLE: Type: Computer-based, three-part sequence, standardized test: Administrator: Federation of State Medical Boards, National Board of Medical Examiners: Skills tested: STEP 1: Application of scientific principles basic to the practice of medicine
The casualty officer, Dr. Banerjee, did not see them. He advised the nurse, over the phone, that they should go home and call their own doctors. One of them, Mr. Barnett, died about five hours later from arsenic poisoning. [2] [1] Mrs. Barnett sued the hospital for negligence. [2]
The Supreme Court departed and overruled the earlier House of Lords case in Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital, in reconsidering the duty of care of a doctor towards a patient on medical treatment. The case changed the Bolam test to a greater test in medical negligence by introducing the general duty to attempt the ...
Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582 is an English tort law case that lays down the typical rule for assessing the appropriate standard of reasonable care in negligence cases involving skilled professionals such as doctors. This rule is known as the Bolam test, and states that if a doctor reaches the standard of a ...
On February 7, 1990, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held in favor of the plaintiffs on their claims against the American Medical Association, but held in favor of the defendants in the plaintiffs' case against the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) and the American College of Physicians (ACP). (Wilk v ...