Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
For instance, take X= S 2 × RP 3 and Y= RP 2 × S 3. Then X and Y have the same fundamental group, namely the cyclic group Z/2, and the same universal cover, namely S 2 × S 3; thus, they have isomorphic homotopy groups. On the other hand their homology groups are different (as can be seen from the Künneth formula); thus, X and Y are not ...
CW complexes satisfy the Whitehead theorem: a map between CW complexes is a homotopy equivalence if and only if it induces an isomorphism on all homotopy groups. A covering space of a CW complex is also a CW complex. [13] The product of two CW complexes can be made into a CW complex.
This becomes straightforward in the absence of 2-torsion in the homology. Quite generally, the result indicates the relationship that holds between the Betti numbers b i of X and the Betti numbers b i,F with coefficients in a field F. These can differ, but only when the characteristic of F is a prime number p for which there is some p-torsion ...
That is, the correct answer in honest Betti numbers is 2, 0, 0. Once more, it is the reduced Betti numbers that work out. With those, we begin with 0, 1, 0. to finish with 1, 0, 0. From these two examples, therefore, Alexander's formulation can be inferred: reduced Betti numbers ~ are related in complements by
This is well-defined because the intersection of a cycle and a boundary consists of an even number of points (by definition of a cycle and a boundary). If M {\displaystyle M} is oriented, analogously (i.e. counting intersections with signs) one defines the intersection form on the 2 {\displaystyle 2} nd homology group
The linking number is defined for two linked circles; given three or more circles, one can define the Milnor invariants, which are a numerical invariant generalizing linking number. In algebraic topology , the cup product is a far-reaching algebraic generalization of the linking number, with the Massey products being the algebraic analogs for ...
It is a theorem, proved first by Frank Adams, and subsequently by Adams and Michael Atiyah with methods of topological K-theory, that these are the only maps with Hopf invariant 1. Whitehead integral formula
The first few Betti numbers have the following definitions for 0-dimensional, 1-dimensional, and 2-dimensional simplicial complexes: b 0 is the number of connected components; b 1 is the number of one-dimensional or "circular" holes; b 2 is the number of two-dimensional "voids" or "cavities".