Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The GAO also produces special publications on specific issues of general interest to many Americans, such as its report on the fiscal future of the United States, GAO's role in the federal bid protest process, and critical issues for congressional consideration related to improving the nation's image abroad.
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has observed that "responsiveness is determined at the time of bid opening from the face of the bid documents", [42] and that "unless something on the face of the bid, or specifically a part of it, limits, reduces or modifies the bidder's obligation to perform in accordance with the terms of the ...
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) had 100 days to review the program and issue a decision on the protest. [25] On December 15, the GAO dismissed Lockheed Martin's protest because the company on December 11 decided to file a “Notice of Post-Award Bid Protest” with the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. The company filed its official ...
In December 2015 the Government Accountability Office (GAO) dismissed Lockheed Martin's protest because the company in December 2015 decided to file a "Notice of Post-Award Bid Protest" with the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. [32] [33] Immediately after the GAO dismissed the protest, the Army instructed Oshkosh to resume work on the JLTV order. [34]
Shortly after, on February 24, 2017, Glock filed a protest of the contract award with the Government Accountability Office (GAO); [38] the GAO denied the bid protest on June 5, 2017. [39] Additionally, in May 2017, Steyr Arms, Inc. of Austria sued SIG Sauer via the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama , claiming ...
NASA Office of Inspector General stated that Blue Origin and Dynetics's bid protests had caused a 4-month delay in the program. [ 23 ] : 15 About two years later in May 2023 NASA awarded Blue Origin a $3.4 billion contract to develop a competing moon lander , compared to the $2.89 billion of the original bid that lead to the lawsuit.
Boeing submitted a protest to the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) in March 2008 and waged a public relations campaign in support of their protest. [21] In June, after USAF admissions on bidding process flaws, the GAO upheld Boeing's protest and recommended the contract be rebid. [21]
On 6 November 2015, Boeing and Lockheed Martin protested the decision to the Government Accountability Office (GAO). Development costs have been estimated to be from $10 to $23 billion. [76] [77] On 16 February 2016, the GAO denied the protest, and Northrop Grumman resumed work on the project. [78]