Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
For example, the Adleman–Pomerance–Rumely primality test runs for n O(log log n) time on n-bit inputs; this grows faster than any polynomial for large enough n, but the input size must become impractically large before it cannot be dominated by a polynomial with small degree.
The worst-case complexity of the algorithm is dominated by the perfect matching step, which has () complexity. [2] Serdyukov's paper claimed O ( n 3 log n ) {\displaystyle O(n^{3}\log n)} complexity, [ 4 ] because the author was only aware of a less efficient perfect matching algorithm.
The PCP theorem states that NP = PCP[O(log n), O(1)],. where PCP[r(n), q(n)] is the class of problems for which a probabilistically checkable proof of a solution can be given, such that the proof can be checked in polynomial time using r(n) bits of randomness and by reading q(n) bits of the proof, correct proofs are always accepted, and incorrect proofs are rejected with probability at least 1/2.
The worst-case complexity is the maximum of the complexity over all inputs of size n, and the average-case complexity is the average of the complexity over all inputs of size n (this makes sense, as the number of possible inputs of a given size is finite). Generally, when "complexity" is used without being further specified, this is the worst ...
The complexity of n is at most 3 log 2 n (approximately 4.755 log 3 n): an expression of this length for n can be found by applying Horner's method to the binary representation of n. [2] Almost all integers have a representation whose length is bounded by a logarithm with a smaller constant factor, 3.529 log 3 n. [3]
The first deterministic primality test significantly faster than the naive methods was the cyclotomy test; its runtime can be proven to be O((log n) c log log log n), where n is the number to test for primality and c is a constant independent of n. Many further improvements were made, but none could be proven to have polynomial running time.
The analysis of the former and the latter algorithm shows that it takes at most log 2 n and n check steps, respectively, for a list of size n. In the depicted example list of size 33, searching for "Morin, Arthur" takes 5 and 28 steps with binary (shown in cyan) and linear (magenta) search, respectively. Graphs of functions commonly used in the ...
Here, complexity refers to the time complexity of performing computations on a multitape Turing machine. [1] See big O notation for an explanation of the notation used. Note: Due to the variety of multiplication algorithms, M ( n ) {\displaystyle M(n)} below stands in for the complexity of the chosen multiplication algorithm.