enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarasoff_v._Regents_of_the...

    Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 (Cal. 1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of California held that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a patient.

  3. Duty to protect - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duty_to_protect

    In medical law and medical ethics, the duty to protect is the responsibility of a mental health professional to protect patients and others from foreseeable harm. [1] If a client makes statements that suggest suicidal or homicidal ideation, the clinician has the responsibility to take steps to warn potential victims, and if necessary, initiate involuntary commitment.

  4. Duty to warn - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duty_to_warn

    People who would be appropriate recipients of such information would include the intended victim and law enforcement. Duty to warn is embedded in the historical context of two rulings (1974 and 1976) of the California Supreme Court in the case of Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California.

  5. Ewing v. Goldstein - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ewing_v._Goldstein

    Ewing v. Goldstein 15 Cal. Rptr. 3d 864 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004) is a landmark court case that extended California mental health professional's duty to protect identifiable victims of potentially violent persons, as established by Tarasoff v.

  6. Talk: Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Tarasoff_v._Regents...

    The first case, Tarasoff I, imposed a "duty to warn". For a number of reasons, this caused great uproar within the mental health profession. The (California) Supreme Court revisited the case a year-and-a-half later. They modified the first case, replacing a "duty to warn" with a "duty to protect". This distinction between the first and second ...

  7. Trump PAC paid the law firm representing indicted legal ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/trump-pac-paid-law-firm...

    In 2021 and 2022, as the Jan. 6 committee sent subpoenas to a web of people close to Trump during the weeks around the Capitol attack, Save America paid roughly $175,000 to the law firm of ...

  8. Judge rules Israeli firm NSO Group liable for damages in ...

    www.aol.com/judge-rules-israeli-firm-nso...

    Messaging service WhatsApp claimed a major legal victory over Israeli spyware firm NSO Group on Friday after a federal judge ruled that NSO was liable under federal and California law for a 2019 ...

  9. Mathew Tobriner - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathew_Tobriner

    A native of San Francisco, Tobriner was educated at Lowell High School and was a member of its famed Lowell Forensic Society, the nation's oldest high school debate team.. He attended Stanford University, and in 1924 received his A.B. degree with Phi Beta Kappa honors, and the next year his M.A. [1] [2] In 1927, he graduated from Harvard Law School magna cum laude and Order of the Coif with a ...