Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
n/a Ensembl ENSG00000180257 n/a UniProt Q0VGE8 n/a RefSeq (mRNA) NM_001202457 NM_001031665 NM_001202456 n/a RefSeq (protein) NP_001026835 NP_001189385 NP_001189386 n/a Location (UCSC) Chr 19: 52.95 – 52.96 Mb n/a PubMed search n/a Wikidata View/Edit Human Zinc Finger Protein 816 (ZNF816) is a protein encoded by the ZNF816 gene, located on chromosome 19 in humans. Gene The ZNF816 gene is ...
The next generation beyond LT codes are Raptor codes (see for example IETF RFC 5053 or IETF RFC 6330), which have linear time encoding and decoding. Raptor codes are fundamentally based on LT codes, i.e., encoding for Raptor codes uses two encoding stages, where the second stage is LT encoding.
In mechanics, strain is defined as relative deformation, compared to a reference position configuration. Different equivalent choices may be made for the expression of a strain field depending on whether it is defined with respect to the initial or the final configuration of the body and on whether the metric tensor or its dual is considered.
As such, eigenstrains have also been referred to as “stress-free strains” [4] and “inherent strains”. [5] When one region of material experiences a different eigenstrain than its surroundings, the restraining effect of the surroundings leads to a stress state on both regions. [ 6 ]
The J-integral represents a way to calculate the strain energy release rate, or work per unit fracture surface area, in a material. [1] The theoretical concept of J-integral was developed in 1967 by G. P. Cherepanov [2] and independently in 1968 by James R. Rice, [3] who showed that an energetic contour path integral (called J) was independent of the path around a crack.
Strain can be induced in thin films with either epitaxial growth, or more recently, topological growth. Epitaxial strain in thin films generally arises due to lattice mismatch between the film and its substrate and triple junction restructuring at the surface triple junction, which arises either during film growth or due to thermal expansion mismatch. [5]
After the band has passed through the material the deformation proceeds uniformly with positive strain hardening. Sometimes Lüders band transition into the Portevin–Le Chatelier effect while changing the temperature or strain rate, this implies these are related phenomena [4] Lüders bands are known as a strain softening instability. [5]
Other rates, used in most commercial codes, which are not work-conjugate to any finite strain tensor are: [8] the Zaremba-Jaumann, or corotational, rate of Cauchy stress: It differs from Zaremba-Jaumann rate of Kirchhoff stress by missing the rate of relative volume change of material. The lack of work-conjugacy is usually not a serious problem ...