Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Questioning the question by: requesting clarification; reflecting the question back to the questioner, for example saying "you tell me" Attacking the question by saying: "the question fails to address the important issue" "the question is hypothetical or speculative" "the question is based on a false premise" "the question is factually inaccurate"
A half-truth is a deceptive statement that includes some element of truth.The statement might be partly true, the statement may be totally true, but only part of the whole truth, or it may use some deceptive element, such as improper punctuation, or double meaning, especially if the intent is to deceive, evade, blame or misrepresent the truth.
Historically, begging the question refers to a fault in a dialectical argument in which the speaker assumes some premise that has not been demonstrated to be true. In modern usage, it has come to refer to an argument in which the premises assume the conclusion without supporting it. This makes it an example of circular reasoning. [1] [2]
Circular reasoning is closely related to begging the question, and in modern usage the two generally refer to the same thing. [4] Circular reasoning is often of the form: "A is true because B is true; B is true because A is true." Circularity can be difficult to detect if it involves a longer chain of propositions.
are two different sentences that make the same statement. In either case, a statement is viewed as a truth bearer. Examples of sentences that are (or make) true statements: "Socrates is a man." "A triangle has three sides." "Madrid is the capital of Spain." Examples of sentences that are also statements, even though they aren't true:
Half a bottle of molasses or demerara based Rum, preferable Doorly's or Real McCoy 5 Year. 1 dozen eggs yolks. 1 dozen egg whites. 3/4 liter of simple syrup. 1/4 liter of Baltimore Rainwater Madeira.
The question is: Before the Feb. 6 trade deadline or after the 2024-25 season? The topic of Butler’s future escalated in the past 48 hours, following his performance in the Heat’s 119-108 ...
Argument from silence (argumentum ex silentio) – assuming that a claim is true based on the absence of textual or spoken evidence from an authoritative source, or vice versa. [ 68 ] Ignoratio elenchi (irrelevant conclusion, missing the point) – an argument that may in itself be valid, but does not address the issue in question.