Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
An example of a reflexive relation is the relation "is equal to" on the set of real numbers, since every real number is equal to itself. A reflexive relation is said to have the reflexive property or is said to possess reflexivity. Along with symmetry and transitivity, reflexivity is one of three properties defining equivalence relations.
A relation is called reflexive if it relates every element of to itself. For example, if X {\displaystyle X} is a set of distinct numbers and x R y {\displaystyle xRy} means " x {\displaystyle x} is less than y {\displaystyle y} ", then the reflexive closure of R {\displaystyle R} is the relation " x {\displaystyle x} is less than or equal to y ...
In mathematics, a relation denotes some kind of relationship between two objects in a set, which may or may not hold. [1] As an example, " is less than " is a relation on the set of natural numbers ; it holds, for instance, between the values 1 and 3 (denoted as 1 < 3 ), and likewise between 3 and 4 (denoted as 3 < 4 ), but not between the ...
A reflexive and symmetric relation is a dependency relation (if finite), and a tolerance relation if infinite. A preorder is reflexive and transitive. A congruence relation is an equivalence relation whose domain X {\displaystyle X} is also the underlying set for an algebraic structure , and which respects the additional structure.
In universal algebra and lattice theory, a tolerance relation on an algebraic structure is a reflexive symmetric relation that is compatible with all operations of the structure. Thus a tolerance is like a congruence , except that the assumption of transitivity is dropped. [ 1 ]
In mathematics, a ternary equivalence relation is a kind of ternary relation analogous to a binary equivalence relation. A ternary equivalence relation is symmetric, reflexive, and transitive, where those terms are meant in the sense defined below. The classic example is the relation of collinearity among three points in Euclidean space.
A binary relation that is antisymmetric, transitive, and reflexive (but not necessarily total) is a partial order. A group with a compatible total order is a totally ordered group. There are only a few nontrivial structures that are (interdefinable as) reducts of a total order. Forgetting the orientation results in a betweenness relation.
Orders are special binary relations. Suppose that P is a set and that ≤ is a relation on P ('relation on a set' is taken to mean 'relation amongst its inhabitants', i.e. ≤ is a subset of the cartesian product P x P). Then ≤ is a partial order if it is reflexive, antisymmetric, and transitive, that is, if for all a, b and c in P, we have that: