enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Stanford v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_v._Texas

    Stanford v. Texas, 379 U.S. 476 (1965), is a major decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. It stated in clear terms that, pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment, the Fourth Amendment rules regarding search and seizure applied to state governments. [1] While this principle had been outlined in other cases, such as Mapp v.

  3. Salinas v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salinas_v._Texas

    Salinas v. Texas, 570 US 178 (2013), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, which the court held 5-4 decision, declaring that the Fifth Amendment's self-incrimination clause does not extend to defendants who simply choose to remain silent during questioning, even though no arrest has been made nor the Miranda rights read to a defendant.

  4. Brown v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Texas

    Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 (1979), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court determined that the defendant's arrest in El Paso, Texas, for a refusal to identify himself, after being seen and questioned in a high crime area, was not based on a reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing and thus violated the Fourth Amendment.

  5. Deputies who reported a Texas sheriff to public corruption ...

    www.aol.com/news/deputies-reported-texas-sheriff...

    A Texas sheriff who's been the subject of years of complaints about dysfunction and corruption was repeatedly reported to state and federal law enforcement by his own deputies — yet an outside ...

  6. Barnes v. Felix - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnes_v._Felix

    Barnes v. Felix is a pending United States Supreme Court case on excessive force claims under the Fourth Amendment. [1] [2] The court will decide whether courts should apply the “moment of the threat” doctrine, which looks only at the narrow window in which a police officer's safety was threatened to determine whether his actions were reasonable, in evaluating claims that police officers ...

  7. Culley v. Marshall - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culley_v._Marshall

    Culley v. Marshall, 601 U.S. 377 (2024), is a case decided by Supreme Court of the United States regarding the timing of post-seizure probable cause hearings under the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment. [1] The Court has been asked to determine whether the "speedy trial" test from Barker v. Wingo or the balancing test from Mathews v.

  8. Oyez, oyez, oyez: A listener's guide to Supreme Court ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/oyez-oyez-oyez-listeners-guide...

    The Supreme Court hears arguments Thursday over whether former President Donald Trump can be kept off the 2024 ballot because of his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results, culminating in ...

  9. In Texas, can police search my cellphone when they pull me ...

    www.aol.com/news/texas-police-search-cellphone...

    The Bill of Rights prevents law enforcement from searching cell phones during a traffic stop without a judge-issued warrant. The Fourth Amendment prohibits “unreasonable search and seizure ...