Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view). If no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.
surprising or apparently important claims that are not widely known; surprising or apparently important reports of historical events not covered by mainstream news media or historiography; reports of a statement by someone that seems out of character, embarrassing, controversial, or against an interest they had previously defended;
It is important not to "cherry-pick" quotations or other material. Source material should be summarized in context to make sure it is represented fairly and accurately, and undue weight should be avoided. In some cases, publication in a reliable source is not sufficient to establish that a view is significant.
Articles should be based on thorough research of sources. All articles must adhere to NPOV, fairly representing all majority and significant-minority viewpoints published by reliable sources, in rough proportion to the prominence of each view. Tiny-minority views need not be included, except in articles devoted to them.
Read more:Opinion: From legal bribery to Trump's immunity, a dark theme ran through the Supreme Court's term In another sweeping decision , the court set aside four decades of precedent and ...
Facts Precede Opinions states that content accepted by Wikipedians to be factual takes precedence over content that is contended to be opinionated. This is a complement to NPOV . When there are conflicting viewpoints among editors there are two options on how to proceed:
All facts and significant points of view on a given subject should be treated in one article except in the case of a spinoff sub-article. Some topics are so large that one article cannot reasonably cover all facets of the topic, so a spinoff sub-article is created.
A significant portion of people with severe mental health conditions report that the current political climate exacerbates their struggles, according to one study.