Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Conflict management is the process of limiting ... This approach engages in a cooperative approach rather than a competitive one. [8] Although the win-win concept is ...
Communication is often seen as crucial to maintaining a healthy relationship, and the way one resolves conflict is important to maintaining healthy relationships. [7] Thomas and Kilmann proposed five modes of conflict management, developed from 1960 to 1975, which can be used to handle particular conflicts. [2]
Conflict resolution is conceptualized as the methods and processes involved in facilitating the peaceful ending of conflict and retribution.Committed group members attempt to resolve group conflicts by actively communicating information about their conflicting motives or ideologies to the rest of group (e.g., intentions; reasons for holding certain beliefs) and by engaging in collective ...
In many cases, upward conflict spirals are sustained by the norms of reciprocity: if one group or person criticizes the other, the criticized person or group feels justified in doing the same. In conflict situations, opponents often follow the norm of rough reciprocity, i.e. they give too much (overmatching) or too little (undermatching) in return.
The concept was popularized in the international community through UN Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali's 1992 report An Agenda for Peace. The report defined post-conflict peacebuilding as an "action to identify and support structures which will tend to strengthen and solidify peace in order to avoid a relapse into conflict". [16]
Conflict is a normal part of working in teams, because it brings creativity and helps avoid groupthink. However, too much conflict can stop teams for doing their work and certain procedures should be followed to get back on track. Guffey, Rhodes, and Rogin describe their six-step process for dealing with conflict in teams: [13]
Interpersonal conflict among people at work has been shown to be one of the most frequently noted stressors for employees. [20] [21] The most often used scale to assess interpersonal conflict at work [22] is the Interpersonal Conflict at Work Scale, ICAWS. [23] Conflict has been noted to be an indicator of the broader concept of workplace ...
Conflict forecasts and early warnings can be sufficiently precise to be relevant for policy and evaluation of theories. [54] Conflict escalation can be rational for one side of the conflict in some cases of asymmetric conflicts, [55] appeasement [45] or for Fait accompli, [56] causing challenges to de-escalation.