Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case involving Arizona's SB 1070, a state law intended to increase the powers of local law enforcement that wished to enforce federal immigration laws. The issue is whether the law usurps the federal government's authority to regulate immigration laws and enforcement.
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 567 of the United States ... Arizona v. United States: 567 U.S. 387: 2012: Miller v. Alabama ...
The District Court’s finding that race predominated in the design of District I in the Enacted Plan was clearly erroneous. Brown v. United States: 22–6389: May 23, 2024: A state drug conviction counts as an ACCA predicate if it involved a drug on the federal schedules at the time of that conviction. Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski: 23–3: May 23, 2024
Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc., 570 U.S. 1 (2013), is a 2012-term United States Supreme Court case revolving around Arizona's unique voter registration requirements, including the necessity of providing documentary proof of citizenship. In a 7–2 decision, the Supreme Court held that Arizona's registration requirements were ...
Case name Citation Date decided Lozano v. Montoya Alvarez: 572 U.S. 1: March 5, 2014 BG Group plc v. Republic of Argentina: 572 U.S. 25: March 5, 2014 Rosemond v.
Supreme Court of the United States 38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444 Established March 4, 1789 ; 235 years ago (1789-03-04) Location Washington, D.C. Coordinates 38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444 Composition method Presidential nomination with Senate confirmation Authorised by ...
A divided Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a Republican push that could have blocked more than 41,000 Arizona voters from casting ballots for president in the closely contested swing state, but ...
Arizona v. Evans, 514 U.S. 1 (1995), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court instituted an exclusionary rule exception allowing evidence obtained through a warrantless search to be valid when a police record erroneously indicates the existence of an outstanding warrant due to negligent conduct of a Clerk of Court.