enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Near v. Minnesota - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_v._Minnesota

    Near v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697 (1931), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court under which prior restraint on publication was found to violate freedom of the press as protected under the First Amendment. This principle was applied to free speech generally in subsequent jurisprudence. [1]

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 283

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Near v. Minnesota ex rel. Olson, 283 U.S. 697 (1931), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court under which prior restraint on publication was found to violate freedom of the press as protected under the First Amendment. This principle was applied to free speech generally in later jurisprudence.

  4. Charles Evans Hughes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Evans_Hughes

    In one of the first major cases of his tenure, Hughes joined with Roberts and the Three Musketeers to strike down a piece of state legislation in the 1931 landmark case of Near v. Minnesota. In his majority opinion, Hughes held that the First Amendment barred states from violating freedom of the press.

  5. Oyez, oyez, oyez: A listener's guide to Supreme Court ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/oyez-oyez-oyez-listeners-guide...

    The Supreme Court hears arguments Thursday over whether former President Donald Trump can be kept off the 2024 ballot because of his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results, culminating in ...

  6. Hughes Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hughes_Court

    Near v. Minnesota (1931): In a 5–4 decision written by Justice Hughes, the court struck down a Minnesota law targeting "malicious" or "scandalous" newspapers. In so doing, the court rejected prior restraints on newspaper publications, ruling that the First Amendment generally does not allow for the censorship of the press.

  7. Report Submitted to: Ambassador Jonathan Moore Robert Gersony

    images.huffingtonpost.com/2008-10-19-PCAAA945.pdf

    Summary of Mozambican Refugee Accounts of Principally Conflict-Related Experience in Mozambique Report Submitted to: Ambassador Jonathan Moore Director, Bureau for Refugee Programs

  8. Minneapolis Star Tribune Co. v. Commissioner - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minneapolis_Star_Tribune...

    Minneapolis Star Tribune Company v. Commissioner, 460 U.S. 575 (1983), was an opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States authored by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor overturning a use tax on paper and ink in excess of $100,000 consumed in any calendar year. The Minneapolis Star Tribune initially paid the tax and sued for a refund.

  9. Trump's missing the point on DEI and meritocracy, experts say

    www.aol.com/news/trumps-missing-point-dei...

    Executive orders signed recently by President Donald Trump state that diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs prioritize diversity over merit in hiring, claiming DEI efforts are an ...