enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Breakup of the Bell System - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breakup_of_the_Bell_System

    The new AT&T Inc. lacks the vertical integration that characterized the historic AT&T Corporation and led to the Department of Justice antitrust suit. [23] AT&T Inc. announced it would not switch back to the Bell logo, [24] thus ending corporate use of the Bell logo by the Baby Bells, with the lone exception of Verizon.

  3. AT&T Wireless Services - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT&T_Wireless_Services

    The AT&T Wireless brand was retired by Cingular on April 26, 2005, six months after the close of the merger. This was per a pre-spinoff agreement with AT&T Corp. that stated that if AT&T Wireless was to be bought by a competitor, the rights to the name AT&T Wireless and the use of the AT&T name in wireless phone service would revert to AT&T Corp.

  4. History of AT&T - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_AT&T

    On November 8, 2017, the United States Department of Justice informed AT&T and Time Warner that they must sell either DirecTV or Turner Broadcasting System, the group of channels that includes CNN, if they want approval for their $84.5 billion merger, according to a New York Times report citing people briefed on the matter. AT&T CEO Randall ...

  5. Why AT&T Will Never Be Great Again - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/2011-12-01-why-atandt-will...

    Yes, the Department of Justice took AT&T's local operations and split it up into. Younger readers may not believe this, but there was a time when AT&T (T) was so powerful that the government had ...

  6. Did AT&T Earnings Knock It Out of the Park? - AOL

    www.aol.com/2012/10/24/did-att-earnings-knock-it...

    Investors can't make up their minds about AT&T's (NYS: T) third quarter, and for good reason. This morning's coverage of the report teetered between celebratory and condemning. For example ...

  7. United States v. AT&T (1982) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._AT&T_(1982)

    United States v. AT&T, 552 F.Supp. 131 (1982), was a ruling of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, [1] that led to the 1984 Bell System divestiture, and the breakup of the old AT&T natural monopoly into seven regional Bell operating companies and a much smaller new version of AT&T.

  8. Why Did AT&T Disappoint in 2013? - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/2013-11-20-why-did-att...

    2013 has not been kind to AT&T . Shares of the telecommunications giant have gained just 6% year to date while the Dow Jones soared 22% higher. Worse, AT&T shares have been totally dead money in ...

  9. McCaw Cellular Communications - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCaw_Cellular_Communications

    Partnering with AT&T as a technology provider, McCaw introduced their "Cellular One" service in 1990, the first truly national cellular system. AT&T purchased 33% of the company in 1992, and arranged a merger in 1994 that made Craig McCaw one of AT&T's largest shareholders. In 2002, the company was spun off from AT&T to become AT&T Wireless ...

  1. Related searches how did at&t get bigger on phone calls back to normal people quote about life

    history of at&t telephonewho owns at&t
    at&t bell system