enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. In re Himmel - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_re_Himmel

    Months earlier, in a case cited in this decision, In re Anglin, 122 Ill.2d 531, 525 N.E.2d 550 (May 18, 1988), the Illinois Supreme Court refused to reinstate the law license of an attorney convicted of (among other felonies) possessing stolen securities, and who wished to be reinstated while continuing to withhold the name of the person or ...

  3. Illinois v. Rodriguez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_v._Rodriguez

    Illinois v. Rodriguez , 497 U.S. 177 (1990), is a U.S. Supreme Court case dealing with the issue of whether a warrantless search conducted pursuant to third party consent violates the Fourth Amendment when the third party does not actually possess common authority over the premises.

  4. Hale v. Committee on Character and Fitness for the State of ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hale_v._Committee_on...

    Hale v. Committee on Character and Fitness for the State of Illinois, 335 F.3d 678 (7th Cir. 2003), was a decision made by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in which the court refused on procedural grounds to disturb the Illinois Committee on Character of Fitness's denial of a license to practice law to Matthew F. Hale, on the ground that he lacked the moral character ...

  5. Ybarra v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ybarra_v._Illinois

    Case history; Prior: 58 Ill. App. 3d 57, 373 N. E. 2d 1013: Holding; When a search warrant specifies the person or people named in the warrant to be searched and the things to be seized, there is no authority to search others not named in the warrant, unless the warrant specifically mentions that the unnamed parties are involved in criminal activity or exigent circumstances are clearly shown.

  6. Illinois v. Caballes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_v._Caballes

    Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (2005), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that the use of a drug-sniffing police dog during a routine traffic stop does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, even if the initial infraction is unrelated to drug offenses.

  7. Another Judge Says Illegal Immigrants Have Second ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/another-judge-says-illegal...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  8. Beauharnais v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beauharnais_v._Illinois

    Beauharnais v. Illinois, 343 U.S. 250 (1952), was a case that came before the United States Supreme Court in 1952. It upheld an Illinois law making it illegal to publish or exhibit any writing or picture portraying the "depravity, criminality, unchastity, or lack of virtue of a class of citizens of any race, color, creed or religion".

  9. Supreme Court leaves Illinois assault weapons ban in place as ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-leaves-illinois...

    The Supreme Court avoided taking up a series of cases on the right to bear arms and left in place an Illinois law that bans assault-style weapons such as the AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, which has ...