Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
CSS-in-JS is a styling technique by which JavaScript is used to style components. When this JavaScript is parsed, CSS is generated (usually as a <style> element) and attached into the DOM. It enables the abstraction of CSS to the component level itself, using JavaScript to describe styles in a declarative and maintainable way.
Based on the type of tags assigned to questions, the top eight most discussed topics on the site are: JavaScript, Java, C#, PHP, Android, Python, jQuery, and HTML.
Version 4.0 transitioned the codebase from XUL/XPCOM to WebExtensions (HTML/CSS/JS/WASM). [11] The first 4.0 beta version was released August 21, 2019. [12] On September 1, 2019, DownThemAll! 4.0 was released, supporting Firefox Quantum. [13] On September 8, 2019, DownThemAll! 4.0.9 was released for Chrome and Opera add-ons.
Chrome was the first browser with an extension API based solely on HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Beta testing for this capability began in 2009, [8] [9] and the following year Google opened the Chrome Web Store. As of June 2012, there were 750 million total installations of extensions and other content hosted on the store. [10]
User:Magnus Manske/less edit clutter.js – interface change, via javascript, that puts references in a separate edit box (screenshot, mailing list discusion) mw:Extension:Uniwiki Generic Edit Page – extension that replaces the default editing page of Mediawiki with a section-based editor (unimplemented)
Some of the inline CSS uses a property text-weight:bold; which I can't find in the CSS documentation; but there is some bolding using the <b>...</b> HTML, and also using the ''' ''' Wikimarkup. What it comes down to is again boldface within a table header - double-bolding.
Although this is a url shortener it's doesn't have the issues inherent in most shorteners. The only end point is a youtube video, so the usual concerns that it could link to anything do not apply here. Whether you use .com or .be you can't link to anything but a youtube video (correct me if that's wrong).
But that video would not qualify as being from a reliable source for Wikipedia purposes due to the bozo intermediary. Now let's say another bozo, say me, uploads that video to the Commons. Since the video is based on reliable data from a reliable source, then it qualifies for the Commons. Assuming it is something within Commons:Com:Project scope.