Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
File:Wong-Baker scale with emoji.png. Add languages. Page contents not supported in other languages. ... Printable version; Page information; Get shortened URL;
An emoji representation of the Wong-Baker scale. The Wong–Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale is a pain scale that was developed by Donna Wong and Connie Baker. The scale shows a series of faces ranging from a happy face at 0, or "no hurt", to a crying face at 10, which represents "hurts like the worst pain imaginable".
Pain scales are tools that can help health care providers diagnose or measure a patients pain's intensity. The most widely used scales are visual , verbal , numerical or some combination of all three forms.
A Chinese pain scale diagram, rating pain on a scale of 1 to 10. A pain scale measures a patient's pain intensity or other features. Pain scales are a common communication tool in medical contexts, and are used in a variety of medical settings. Pain scales are a necessity to assist with better assessment of pain and patient screening.
One such method is the Wong-Baker faces pain scale. Time (history) How long the condition has been going on and how it has changed since onset (better, worse, different symptoms), whether it has ever happened before, whether and how it may have changed since onset, and when the pain stopped if it is no longer currently being felt.
The FLACC scale or Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale is a measurement used to assess pain for children between the ages of 2 months and 7 years or individuals that are unable to communicate their pain. The scale is scored in a range of 0–10 with 0 representing no pain.
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: Wong Baker Scale.sr.JPG; You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above.
The EmojiGrid was inspired by Russell's Affect Grid [1] and was originally developed and validated for the affective appraisal of food stimuli, [2] since conventional affective self-report tools (e.g., the Self-Assessment Manikin) are frequently misunderstood in that context.