enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Nash equilibrium - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nash_equilibrium

    The subgame perfect equilibrium in addition to the Nash equilibrium requires that the strategy also is a Nash equilibrium in every subgame of that game. This eliminates all non-credible threats , that is, strategies that contain non-rational moves in order to make the counter-player change their strategy.

  3. Cooperative bargaining - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative_bargaining

    The Nash equilibrium was the most common agreement (mode), but the average (mean) agreement was closer to a point based on expected utility. [11] In real-world negotiations, participants often first search for a general bargaining formula, and then only work out the details of such an arrangement, thus precluding the disagreement point and ...

  4. List of types of equilibrium - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_types_of_equilibrium

    Nash equilibrium, the basic solution concept in game theory Quasi-perfect equilibrium, a refinement of Nash Equilibrium for extensive form games due to Eric van Damme; Sequential equilibrium, a refinement of Nash Equilibrium for games of incomplete information due to David M. Kreps and Robert Wilson; Perfect Bayesian equilibrium, a refinement ...

  5. Solution concept - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solution_concept

    A Nash equilibrium is a strategy profile (a strategy profile specifies a strategy for every player, e.g. in the above prisoners' dilemma game (cooperate, defect) specifies that prisoner 1 plays cooperate and prisoner 2 plays defect) in which every strategy played by every agent (agent i) is a best response to every other strategy played by all the other opponents (agents j for every j≠i) .

  6. Bertrand competition - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand_competition

    Therefore, the sole equilibrium in the Bertrand model emerges when both firms establish a price equal to unit cost, known as the competitive price. [9] It is to highlight that the Bertrand equilibrium is a weak Nash-equilibrium. The firms lose nothing by deviating from the competitive price: it is an equilibrium simply because each firm can ...

  7. Bertrand paradox (economics) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand_paradox_(economics)

    Since both A and B know this, they will each try to undercut their competitor until the product is selling at zero economic profit. This is the pure-strategy Nash equilibrium. Recent work has shown that there may be an additional mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium with positive economic profits under the assumption that monopoly profits are infinite.

  8. Focal point (game theory) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focal_point_(game_theory)

    Adding repetition to the game introduces a focal point at the Nash equilibrium solution of 0. This was shown by Camerer as, “[when] the game is played multiple times with the same group, the average moves close to 0.” [ 5 ] Introducing the iterative aspect to the game forces all players onto higher levels of thinking which allows them all ...

  9. Evolutionary game theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_game_theory

    Nash equilibrium is a game equilibrium where it is not rational for any player to deviate from their present strategy, provided that the others adhere to their strategies. An ESS is a state of game dynamics where, in a very large population of competitors, another mutant strategy cannot successfully enter the population to disturb the existing ...