enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Decades later, former foster children allege abuse at ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/decades-later-former-foster...

    Two decades after the MacLaren Children's Center was closed, former foster children housed at the El Monte facility are coming forward with allegations of abuse. Lawsuits involving about 200 ...

  3. Category:Supreme Court of California case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Supreme_Court_of...

    Supreme Court of California tort case law (2 P) Pages in category "Supreme Court of California case law" The following 52 pages are in this category, out of 52 total.

  4. Category:Supreme Court of California tort case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Supreme_Court_of...

    Pages in category "Supreme Court of California tort case law" The following 2 pages are in this category, out of 2 total. This list may not reflect recent changes. E.

  5. Horsley v MacLaren - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horsley_v_MacLaren

    Horsley v MacLaren, [1972] S.C.R. 441, also known as the Ogopogo case, [1] is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision where it was held that there is no duty at common law to rescue or aid anyone in distress. Furthermore, "a person who imperils himself by his carelessness may be as fully liable to a rescuer as a third person would be who ...

  6. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol-Myers_Squibb_Co._v...

    Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, 582 U.S. ___ (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that California courts lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendant on claims brought by plaintiffs who are not California residents and did not suffer their alleged injury in California. [1]

  7. Duty to warn - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duty_to_warn

    Duty to warn is embedded in the historical context of two rulings (1974 and 1976) of the California Supreme Court in the case of Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. [15] [page needed] [16] The court held that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a patient ...

  8. Judge OKs settlement in Mallory Beach lawsuit, Buster ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/judge-approves-settlement...

    Circuit Court Judge Daniel Hall approved a settlement in the wrongful death lawsuit filed by the family of Mallory Beach, who was killed in a 2019 boat crash. The lawsuit had accused Murdaugh’s ...

  9. Regents of University of California v. Superior Court of Los ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regents_of_University_of...

    Regents of the University of California v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County , 4 Cal. 5th 607, 413 P.3d 656 (2018), was a case in which the Supreme Court of California held that universities owe a duty to protect students from foreseeable violence during curricular activities.