enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Irreducible complexity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreducible_complexity

    Irreducible complexity (IC) is the argument that certain biological systems with multiple interacting parts would not function if one of the parts were removed, so supposedly could not have evolved by successive small modifications from earlier less complex systems through natural selection, which would need all intermediate precursor systems to have been fully functional. [1]

  3. Darwin's Black Box - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin's_Black_Box

    Darwin's Black Box was not well received by the scientific community, which rejected Behe's premises and arguments. Kenneth Miller described Behe's argument as an updated version of the argument from design with reference to biochemistry (which was echoed by other reviewers), [10] [11] and also cites areas in biochemistry and the fossil record which demonstrate currently irreducibly complex ...

  4. Evolution of the eye - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_the_eye

    The rate of eye evolution is difficult to estimate because the fossil record, particularly of the lower Cambrian, is poor. How fast a circular patch of photoreceptor cells can evolve into a fully functional vertebrate eye has been estimated based on rates of mutation, relative advantage to the organism, and natural selection.

  5. Objections to evolution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objections_to_evolution

    Objections to evolution have been raised since evolutionary ideas came to prominence in the 19th century. When Charles Darwin published his 1859 book On the Origin of Species, his theory of evolution (the idea that species arose through descent with modification from a single common ancestor in a process driven by natural selection) initially met opposition from scientists with different ...

  6. Michael Behe - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Behe

    Irreducible complexity is a negative argument against evolution, not proof of design, a point conceded by defense expert Professor Minnich." [ 51 ] "Professor Behe's concept of irreducible complexity depends on ignoring ways in which evolution is known to occur.

  7. Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area...

    They are: (1) ID violates the centuries-old ground rules of science by invoking and permitting supernatural causation; (2) the argument of irreducible complexity, central to ID, employs the same flawed and illogical contrived dualism that doomed creation science in the 1980s; and (3) ID's negative attacks on evolution have been refuted by the ...

  8. Visual system - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_system

    The neuropsychological side of visual information processing is known as visual perception, an abnormality of which is called visual impairment, and a complete absence of which is called blindness. The visual system also has several non-image forming visual functions, independent of visual perception, including the pupillary light reflex and ...

  9. Joseph Thornton (biologist) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Thornton_(biologist)

    Joseph (Joe) Thornton is an American Biologist.He is a professor at the University of Chicago and a former Early Career Scientist of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.He is known for resurrecting ancestral genes and tracing the mechanisms by which proteins evolve new functions.