enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Disjoint sets - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disjoint_sets

    Disjoint-set data structures [9] and partition refinement [10] are two techniques in computer science for efficiently maintaining partitions of a set subject to, respectively, union operations that merge two sets or refinement operations that split one set into two. A disjoint union may mean one of two things.

  3. Difference set - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Difference_set

    An example of a (7,3,1) difference set in the group / is the subset {,,}. The translates of this difference set form the Fano plane. Since every difference set gives a symmetric design, the parameter set must satisfy the Bruck–Ryser–Chowla theorem. [4]

  4. Russell's paradox - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell's_paradox

    The term "naive set theory" is used in various ways. In one usage, naive set theory is a formal theory, that is formulated in a first-order language with a binary non-logical predicate ∈ {\displaystyle \in } , and that includes the axiom of extensionality :

  5. Set (mathematics) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_(mathematics)

    A set of polygons in an Euler diagram This set equals the one depicted above since both have the very same elements.. In mathematics, a set is a collection of different [1] things; [2] [3] [4] these things are called elements or members of the set and are typically mathematical objects of any kind: numbers, symbols, points in space, lines, other geometrical shapes, variables, or even other ...

  6. List of cognitive biases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases

    Egocentric bias is the tendency to rely too heavily on one's own perspective and/or have a different perception of oneself relative to others. [35] The following are forms of egocentric bias: Bias blind spot , the tendency to see oneself as less biased than other people, or to be able to identify more cognitive biases in others than in oneself.

  7. Paradoxes of set theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradoxes_of_set_theory

    In the same year the French mathematician Jules Richard used a variant of Cantor's diagonal method to obtain another contradiction in naive set theory. Consider the set A of all finite agglomerations of words. The set E of all finite definitions of real numbers is a subset of A. As A is countable, so is E.

  8. Category of sets - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_of_sets

    Set is the prototype of a concrete category; other categories are concrete if they are "built on" Set in some well-defined way. Every two-element set serves as a subobject classifier in Set. The power object of a set A is given by its power set, and the exponential object of the sets A and B is given by the set of all functions from A to B.

  9. Type theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_theory

    Type theory was created to avoid a paradox in a mathematical equation [b] based on naive set theory and formal logic. Russell's paradox (first described in Gottlob Frege's The Foundations of Arithmetic) is that, without proper axioms, it is possible to define the set of all sets that are not members of themselves; this set both contains itself and does not contain itself.