enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparative negligence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_negligence

    Comparative negligence, called non-absolute contributory negligence outside the United States, is a partial legal defense that reduces the amount of damages that a plaintiff can recover in a negligence-based claim, based upon the degree to which the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to cause the injury.

  3. Hoffman v. Jones - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoffman_v._Jones

    The Florida Supreme Court adopted the concept of "pure" comparative negligence, which allows a victim to be compensated for the percentage of harm caused by the at-fault person. The decision of the court in Hoffman v. Jones has been cited in law school textbooks, and now the concept of comparative negligence is the prevailing doctrine.

  4. What does no-fault state mean? - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/does-no-fault-state-mean...

    States with pure comparative negligence. In states that follow pure comparative negligence guidelines, all parties involved in an accident are able to claim damages regardless of what percentage ...

  5. Contributory negligence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contributory_negligence

    The classic version of contributory negligence, where a plaintiff who is even 0.01% negligent is barred from recovery, nowadays is referred to as "pure contributory negligence." [3] Some states have adopted a "modified" or "mixed" version of contributory negligence where the plaintiff is only barred from recovery if he or she was more than a ...

  6. Arizona car insurance laws - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/arizona-car-insurance-laws...

    Arizona is a comparative negligence state. If two drivers are both somewhat responsible for an accident, the insurance companies will assign a percentage to their fault. For example, if Driver A ...

  7. Li v. Yellow Cab Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_v._Yellow_Cab_Co.

    Li v. Yellow Cab Co., 13 Cal.3d 804, 532 P.2d 1226 (1975), commonly referred to simply as Li, is a California Supreme Court case that judicially embraced comparative negligence in California tort law and rejected strict contributory negligence.

  8. Outline of tort law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_tort_law

    Comparative negligence – A partial defense that reduces the amount of damages a plaintiff can claim based upon the degree to which the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to the damages. Most jurisdictions have adopted this doctrine; those not adopting it are Alabama, Maryland, North Carolina, Virginia, And Washington D.C.

  9. US Justice Department finds violations in Oklahoma's ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-justice-department-finds...

    The report, from the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, also found that Oklahoma City, the state's largest city, defaults to sending police officers to deal with mental health crises even ...