enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. What is a restrictive covenant? And how are they used today ...

    www.aol.com/restrictive-covenant-used-today-nc...

    This Woodcrest covenant states that only detached, single-family, two-and-a-half-story homes can be built in the subdivision. The George Building Company recorded the covenants in the Wake County ...

  3. NC clash between higher density housing and neighborhood ...

    www.aol.com/nc-clash-between-higher-density...

    “The issue regarding the restrictive covenants is a private matter that the city is not involved in,” said Julia Milstead, the city’s public information officer, in an emailed statement.

  4. What is a restrictive covenant? And how are they used today ...

    www.aol.com/news/restrictive-covenant-used-today...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  5. Blockbusting - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockbusting

    Kraemer case in 1948, the Supreme Court ruled that the amendment's Equal Protection Clause outlawed the states' legal enforcement of racially restrictive covenants in state courts. In this event, decades of segregation practices were annulled, which had compelled blacks to live in overcrowded and over-priced ghettos .

  6. List of Jim Crow law examples by state - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jim_Crow_law...

    Chicago adopted racially restrictive housing covenants beginning in 1927. [13] In 1948, the United States Supreme Court ruled that enforcement of racial restrictive covenants was unconstitutional. 1953: Housing In August 1953, the first black family moved into Trumbull Park, a formerly all-white project of the Chicago Housing Authority.

  7. Cameron Park Historic District - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cameron_Park_Historic_District

    Cameron Park's developers used restrictive deed covenants that set minimum house prices, created setbacks from the street, and excluded African Americans from living in the neighborhood (except as live-in domestic employees).

  8. Davidson Bros., Inc. v. D. Katz & Sons, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davidson_Bros.,_Inc._v._D...

    Davidson Bros., Inc. v. D. Katz & Sons, Inc., 643 A.2d 642 (App. Div. 1994), was a case decided by the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey that first applied public policy considerations instead of the touch and concern doctrine when deciding the validity of a restrictive covenant.

  9. Shelley v. Kraemer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelley_v._Kraemer

    Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948), is a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court case that held that racially restrictive housing covenants cannot legally be enforced.. The case arose after an African-American family purchased a house in St. Louis that was subject to a restrictive covenant preventing "people of the Negro or Mongolian Race" from occupying the property.