enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of United States Supreme Court copyright case law

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    The laches defense is not available in copyright infringement cases. American Broadcasting Cos., Inc. v. Aereo, Inc. 573 U.S. 431: 2014: 6–3: ... For example, a ...

  3. List of copyright case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_copyright_case_law

    Note: if no court name is given, according to convention, the case is from the Supreme Court of the United States.Supreme Court rulings are binding precedent across the United States; Circuit Court rulings are binding within a certain portion of it (the circuit in question); District Court rulings are not binding precedent, but may still be referred to by other courts.

  4. Viacom International Inc. v. YouTube, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viacom_International_Inc...

    In total, Viacom claimed direct infringement and indirect infringement, specifically inducement, contributory infringement and vicarious infringement. [ 7 ] Viacom did not seek damages for any actions after Google put its Content ID filtering system in place in early 2008, and instead pursued declaratory relief on the ability of American ...

  5. Copyright infringement lawsuit against Bad Bunny, Karol G and ...

    www.aol.com/news/copyright-infringement-lawsuit...

    In June 2023, attorneys for the defendants asked judge André Birotte Jr. of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California to dismiss the case, arguing that the plaintiffs were ...

  6. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A&M_Records,_Inc._v...

    Cir., 2001) was a landmark intellectual property case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court ruling that the defendant, peer-to-peer file sharing service Napster, could be held liable for contributory infringement and vicarious infringement of copyright. [1]

  7. Pharrell Williams v. Bridgeport Music - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharrell_Williams_v...

    On March 10, 2015, the jury unanimously found Thicke and Williams liable for copyright infringement. It awarded a sum of $7.3 million as damages for the infringement to Gaye's family. The amount was reduced by the District Court to $5.3 million, along with 50 percent royalties on future songwriter and publishing revenue of "Blurred Lines".

  8. The professor believes Adele’s and Geraes’ case exemplifies how ambiguous copyright infringement laws “reduce the question of infringement to the ear of the beholder.” Image credits: Adele

  9. Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_LLC_v._Oracle...

    The case was assigned to Judge William Alsup, who split the case into three phases: copyright, patent, and damages. The copyright phase started on April 16, 2012, and consisted of several distinct claims of infringement: a nine-line rangeCheck function, several test files, the structure, sequence and organization (SSO) of the Java (API), and ...