Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Four practical strategies have been developed that provide workable methods of estimating test reliability. [7] 1. Test-retest reliability method: directly assesses the degree to which test scores are consistent from one test administration to the next. It involves: Administering a test to a group of individuals
Kendall's W (also known as Kendall's coefficient of concordance) is a non-parametric statistic for rank correlation.It is a normalization of the statistic of the Friedman test, and can be used for assessing agreement among raters and in particular inter-rater reliability.
Congeneric reliability applies to datasets of vectors: each row X in the dataset is a list X i of numerical scores corresponding to one individual. The congeneric model supposes that there is a single underlying property ("factor") of the individual F , such that each numerical score X i is a noisy measurement of F .
In many situations, the score statistic reduces to another commonly used statistic. [11] In linear regression, the Lagrange multiplier test can be expressed as a function of the F-test. [12] When the data follows a normal distribution, the score statistic is the same as the t statistic. [clarification needed]
Content validity evidence involves the degree to which the content of the test matches a content domain associated with the construct. For example, a test of the ability to add two numbers should include a range of combinations of digits. A test with only one-digit numbers, or only even numbers, would not have good coverage of the content domain.
Alpha is also a function of the number of items, so shorter scales will often have lower reliability estimates yet still be preferable in many situations because they are lower burden. An alternative way of thinking about internal consistency is that it is the extent to which all of the items of a test measure the same latent variable. The ...
The p-value for the permutation test is the proportion of the r values generated in step (2) that are larger than the Pearson correlation coefficient that was calculated from the original data. Here "larger" can mean either that the value is larger in magnitude, or larger in signed value, depending on whether a two-sided or one-sided test is ...
The item-reliability index (IRI) is defined as the product of the point-biserial item-total correlation and the item standard deviation. In classical test theory, the IRI indexes the degree to which an item contributes true score variance to the exam observed score variance. In practice, a negative IRI indicates the relative degree which an ...