Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In the C and C++ programming languages, an inline function is one qualified with the keyword inline; this serves two purposes: . It serves as a compiler directive that suggests (but does not require) that the compiler substitute the body of the function inline by performing inline expansion, i.e. by inserting the function code at the address of each function call, thereby saving the overhead ...
In computing, inline expansion, or inlining, is a manual or compiler optimization that replaces a function call site with the body of the called function. Inline expansion is similar to macro expansion, but occurs during compilation, without changing the source code (the text), while macro expansion occurs prior to compilation, and results in different text that is then processed by the compiler.
Macros are expanded (copy pasted) by the preprocessor, before program compiling; templates are actual real functions. Macros are always expanded inline; templates can also be inline functions when the compiler deems it appropriate. However, templates are generally considered an improvement over macros for these purposes. Templates are type-safe.
Inline variables, which allows the definition of variables in header files without violating the one definition rule. The rules are effectively the same as inline functions __has_include, allowing the availability of a header to be checked by preprocessor directives [25] Value of __cplusplus changed to 201703L [26]
Parameterized macros are a useful source-level mechanism for performing in-line expansion, but in languages such as C where they use simple textual substitution, they have a number of severe disadvantages over other mechanisms for performing in-line expansion, such as inline functions.
Programs written in D can use the inline assembler. Rewriting sections "pays off" in these circumstances because of a general "rule of thumb" known as the 90/10 law, which states that 90% of the time is spent in 10% of the code, and only 10% of the time in the remaining 90% of the code. So, putting intellectual effort into optimizing just a ...
Inline comments are generally those that use a newline character to indicate the end of a comment, and an arbitrary delimiter or sequence of tokens to indicate the beginning of a comment. Examples: Symbol
MSVC only supports inline assembler on 32-bit x86. [5] The Rust language has since migrated to a syntax abstracting away inline assembly options further than the LLVM (GCC-style) version. It provides enough information to allow transforming the block into an externally-assembled function if the backend could not handle embedded assembly. [7]