Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
After blowing up at its singular point it becomes the ordinary cusp y 2 = x 3, which still has multiplicity 2. It is clear that the singularity has improved, since the degree of defining polynomial has decreased. This does not happen in general. An example where it does not is given by the isolated singularity of x 2 + y 3 z + z 3 = 0 at the
(Here 15 divided by 4 is 3, with a remainder of 3.) ... (237) is the quotient, and the last small digit (2) is the remainder. ... The remainder is zero, so 16762109 ...
The polynomial 3x 2 − 5x + 4 is written in descending powers of x. The first term has coefficient 3, indeterminate x, and exponent 2. In the second term, the coefficient is −5. The third term is a constant. Because the degree of a non-zero polynomial is the largest degree of any one term, this polynomial has degree two. [11]
The multiplicity of a prime which does not divide n may be called 0 or may be considered ... A prime number has Ω(n) = 1. The first: 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23 ...
This polynomial has two sign changes, as the sequence of signs is (−, +, +, −), meaning that this second polynomial has two or zero positive roots; thus the original polynomial has two or zero negative roots. In fact, the factorization of the first polynomial is = (+) (),
"Every table has homemade salsa on it, and I got a tamarind drink that was a great combo of sweet and sour that perfectly offset the warm and cozy stew. It was a perfect meal for a longer pit stop.
Belichick’s deal also provides him with a $100,000 expense annual expense account and the possibility of getting $3.5 million a year in bonuses. Among the bonuses, a total of $250,000 looks to ...
60 = 2 × 2 × 3 × 5, the multiplicity of the prime factor 2 is 2 , while the multiplicity of each of the prime factors 3 and 5 is 1 . Thus, 60 has four prime factors allowing for multiplicities, but only three distinct prime factors.