Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Relevance feedback is a feature of some information retrieval systems. The idea behind relevance feedback is to take the results that are initially returned from a given query, to gather user feedback, and to use information about whether or not those results are relevant to perform a new query. We can usefully distinguish between three types ...
Asks whether a claim made is relevant and encyclopedic Template parameters [Edit template data] This template prefers inline formatting of parameters. Parameter Description Type Status reason reason Adds additional text to the end of the text which appears in a tooltip when hovering over the "relevant?" text of the tag. String optional discuss discuss talk The name of the talk page section to ...
Template: Relevance and scope. Add languages. Add links. ... This template shows project space pages to do with relevance and scope; mainly essays and policy pages ...
Relevance level "Lower" – Information that is "twice removed" should usually not be included unless the other considerations described above are unusually strong. For example, in the above "John Smith" article, "Murderer Larry Jones was also a member of the XYZ organization."
Add the new template to the table in the common documentation afterwards. Please consider reusing one of the other templates and please choose the color sensibly. If you find a table cell template that does not take a parameter and you want to be able to change the text in the cell, do not duplicate the template! Instead, edit the template and ...
Templates are a very powerful feature of MediaWiki, but can be confusing to new users and even experienced users can have difficulty making sense of the more complex ones. Templates should therefore be accompanied by documentation to improve usability. Template documentation should explain what a template does and how to use it.
When not obvious, relevance is decided by the editors of the article, based on what is considered likely to be useful to readers. The give and take between editors functions as a social-engine for discerning relevance. Wikipedia policy maintains the health of that social engine but does not itself act as an engine for discerning relevance.
Martin Walker's statement, in a newspaper article about Bill Clinton, [2] that "In high school, he was part of a jazz band called Three Blind Mice" is plainly a trivial mention of that band. "Reliable" means that sources need editorial integrity to allow verifiable evaluation of notability, per the reliable source guideline.