enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Automatism (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatism_(law)

    In many jurisdictions, there is a distinction made between "sane automatism" and "insane automatism". Where the involuntariness is caused by a mental illness, or "disease of the mind", as per the M'Naghten rules, it will be regarded as "insane automatism" and will often result in a special verdict of "not guilty by reason of insanity". This can ...

  3. M'Naghten rules - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M'Naghten_rules

    The House of Lords delivered the following exposition of the rules: . the jurors ought to be told in all cases that every man is to be presumed to be sane, and to possess a sufficient degree of reason to be responsible for his crimes, until the contrary be proved to their satisfaction; and that to establish a defence on the ground of insanity, it must be clearly proved that, at the time of the ...

  4. R v Quick - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Quick

    R v Quick [1973] QB 910 is an English criminal case, as to sane automatism and the sub-category of self-inducement of such a state. The court ruled that it may not be used as a defence if the defendant's loss of self-control was on the part of negligence in consuming or not consuming something which someone ought to but the jury must be properly directed so as to make all relevant findings of ...

  5. Insanity in English law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insanity_in_English_law

    The idea of insanity in English law dates from 1324, when the Statute de Praerogativa Regis allowed the King to take the lands of "idiots and lunatics." The early law used various words, including "idiot", "fool" and "sot" to refer to those who had been insane since birth, [2] and "lunatic" for those who had later become insane, or were insane with some lucid intervals. [3]

  6. R v Burgess - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Burgess

    R v Burgess [1991] 2 QB 92 was an appeal in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales that adjudged sleepwalking entailing violence from an internal, organic cause amounts to insane automatism. At first instance Burgess was likewise found not guilty by reason of insanity as his case fell under the M'Naghten Rules. This would entail a possible ...

  7. Image credits: the_mojoe_risin The moderator also shared that the community has grown fairly organically, “that is to say without much promotional effort (it was Subreddit of the Day a few years ...

  8. “How Mental”: 30 Hilarious Memes For Anyone Struggling To ...

    www.aol.com/116-hilarious-memes-send-therapist...

    Image credits: PainBeWILIN__ "Self-care means taking the time to do things that help you live well and improve both your physical health and mental health. This can help you manage stress, lower ...

  9. Insanity defense - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insanity_defense

    Thus, an insane defendant may be found guilty based on the facts just like a sane defendant, but insanity will preclude punishment. The definition of insanity is similar to the M'Naught criterion above: "the accused is insane, if during the act, due to a mental illness, profound mental retardation or a severe disruption of mental health or ...