enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Condorcet method - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet_method

    Example Condorcet method voting ballot. Blank votes are equivalent to ranking that candidate last. A Condorcet method (English: / k ɒ n d ɔːr ˈ s eɪ /; French: [kɔ̃dɔʁsɛ]) is an election method that elects the candidate who wins a majority of the vote in every head-to-head election against each of the other candidates, whenever there is such a candidate.

  3. Condorcet winner criterion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet_winner_criterion

    Approval voting fails the Condorcet criterion Consider an election in which 70% of the voters prefer candidate A to candidate B to candidate C, while 30% of the voters prefer C to B to A. If every voter votes for their top two favorites, Candidate B would win (with 100% approval) even though A would be the Condorcet winner.

  4. Voting criteria - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_criteria

    A voting system complying with the Condorcet loser criterion will never allow a Condorcet loser to win. A Condorcet loser is a candidate who can be defeated in a head-to-head competition against each other candidate. [11] (Not all elections will have a Condorcet loser since it is possible for three or more candidates to be mutually defeatable ...

  5. The End of the Voting Methods Debate - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/end-voting-methods-debate...

    A voting method is the procedure at the heart of an election that specifies what information is to be gathered from voters, and how that collected information is to be utilized to determine the ...

  6. Condorcet paradox - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet_paradox

    In social choice theory, Condorcet's voting paradox is a fundamental discovery by the Marquis de Condorcet that majority rule is inherently self-contradictory.The result implies that it is logically impossible for any voting system to guarantee that a winner will have support from a majority of voters: for example there can be rock-paper-scissors scenario where a majority of voters will prefer ...

  7. Paradox of voting - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_voting

    The issue was noted by Nicolas de Condorcet in 1793 when he stated, "In single-stage elections, where there are a great many voters, each voter's influence is very small. . It is therefore possible that the citizens will not be sufficiently interested [to vote]" and "... we know that this interest [which voters have in an election] must decrease with each individual's [i.e. voter's] influence ...

  8. Comparison of voting rules - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_voting_rules

    They looked at Condorcet cycles in voter preferences (an example of which is A being preferred to B by a majority of voters, B to C and C to A) and found that the number of them was consistent with small-sample effects, concluding that "voting cycles will occur very rarely, if at all, in elections with many voters."

  9. California vote count is slow, that doesn't mean it's 'rigged ...

    www.aol.com/california-vote-count-slow-doesnt...

    The claim: California counting ballots two weeks after Election Day is evidence it was ‘rigged’ A Nov. 19 Instagram post (direct link, archive link) claims one state’s lengthy vote-counting ...