enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Disjunction elimination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disjunction_elimination

    In propositional logic, disjunction elimination [1] [2] (sometimes named proof by cases, case analysis, or or elimination) is the valid argument form and rule of inference that allows one to eliminate a disjunctive statement from a logical proof.

  3. Disjunctive syllogism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disjunctive_syllogism

    The name "disjunctive syllogism" derives from its being a syllogism, a three-step argument, and the use of a logical disjunction (any "or" statement.) For example, "P or Q" is a disjunction, where P and Q are called the statement's disjuncts .

  4. Syllogism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syllogism

    A syllogism takes the form (note: M – Middle, S – subject, P – predicate.): Major premise: All M are P. Minor premise: All S are M. Conclusion/Consequent: All S are P. The premises and conclusion of a syllogism can be any of four types, which are labeled by letters [14] as follows. The meaning of the letters is given by the table:

  5. List of valid argument forms - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_valid_argument_forms

    In Disjunctive Syllogism, the first premise establishes two options. The second takes one away, so the conclusion states that the remaining one must be true. [3] It is shown below in logical form. Either A or B Not A Therefore B. When A and B are replaced with real life examples it looks like below.

  6. Constructive dilemma - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructive_dilemma

    Constructive dilemma [1] [2] [3] is a valid rule of inference of propositional logic.It is the inference that, if P implies Q and R implies S and either P or R is true, then either Q or S has to be true.

  7. Affirming a disjunct - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirming_a_disjunct

    This inference is unsound because all cats, by definition, are mammals. A second example provides a first proposition that appears realistic and shows how an obviously flawed conclusion still arises under this fallacy. [3] To be on the cover of Vogue Magazine, one must be a celebrity or very beautiful. This month's cover was a celebrity.

  8. Fallacy of the undistributed middle - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy_of_the...

    B is the common term between the two premises (the middle term) but is never distributed, so this syllogism is invalid. B would be distributed by introducing a premise which states either All B is Z, or No B is Z. Also, a related rule of logic is that anything distributed in the conclusion must be distributed in at least one premise. All Z is B

  9. Propositional calculus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propositional_calculus

    Either London is the ... [34] This is the "truth of negation" definition of falsity-in-a-case. ... Disjunctive Syllogism can be used as an easier alternative ...