Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Animal rights writer Henry S. Salt termed the replaceability argument the "logic of the larder".. In 1789, the utilitarian philosopher Jeremy Bentham endorsed a variant of the argument, contending that painlessly killing a nonhuman animal is beneficial for everyone because it does not harm the animal and the consumers of the meat produced from the animal's body are better off as a result.
Various types of meat. Conversations regarding the ethics of eating meat are focused on whether or not it is moral to eat non-human animals.Ultimately, this is a debate that has been ongoing for millennia, and it remains one of the most prominent topics in food ethics. [1]
Religious belief in God-given dominion over animals can also justify eating meat. [86] A series of studies published in 2015 asked meat-eating American and Australian undergraduates to "list three reasons why you think it is OK to eat meat." Over 90% of participants offered reasons which the researchers classified among the "four N's":
His 2019 book, Dialogues on Ethical Vegetarianism, is a series of dialogues on the ethics of eating meat. Peter Singer, who wrote the foreword to the book, commented that "In the future, when people ask me why I don't eat meat, I will tell them to read this book." [17] [18]
Women eat less red meat than men. (Getty Creative) (d3sign via Getty Images) For better or worse, some stereotypes hold true, including, according to a new study, that men eat more red meat than ...
What to eat instead of deli meat If you're really craving a deli sandwich, Cassetty advises buying a rotisserie chicken or freshly roasted turkey as healthier protein sources compared to packaged ...
Women, said Naguleswaran, are simply more likely to ditch meat, and to care about how their diet affects the environment and other people. It’s not your imagination. Men really do eat more meat ...
He draws from Dicaearchus's account of Greek history, where abstinence from meat-eating was part of the blessed life, and luxury, war and injustice only became part of people's lives when they began to slaughter animals. [1] Porphyry addresses whether the systematic slaughter of animals in a society results in a utilitarian advantage.