Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Notice under Rule 12b25 of inability to timely file all or part of a Form 10-K, 10-KSB, or 10KT (Amendment) NT 10-Q Notice under Rule 12b25 of inability to timely file all or part of a form 10-Q or 10-QSB NT 10-Q/A Notice under Rule 12b25 of inability to timely file all or part of a form 10-Q or 10-QSB (Amendment) NT 11-K
Employees entitled to notice under the WARN Act include managers and supervisors, hourly wage, and salaried workers. The WARN Act requires that notice also be given to employees' representatives (e.g., a labor union), the local chief elected official (e.g. the mayor), and the state dislocated worker unit. The advance notice is intended to give ...
In April 2006, relatives of 53-year-old Andrea Clark were given the 10-day notice under this act. [3] [4] She had reportedly signed a statement she did not wish to die and was cognizant, although having difficulties communicating while under heavy medication and after her brain was damaged by internal bleeding and the effects of heart disease ...
A notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) is a public notice that is issued by law when a U.S. federal agency wishes to add, remove, or change a rule or regulation as part of the rulemaking process. The notice is an important part of US administrative law, which facilitates government by typically creating a process of taking of public comment.
The question presented, which has divided the courts of appeals, is whether a Rule 41 voluntary dismissal without prejudice is a "final judgment, order, or proceeding" under Rule 60(b). October 4, 2024 (January 14, 2025) Williams v. Washington: 23-191
Under the wording of the rule, judicial notice is permissive if the court takes such notice on its own but mandatory if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary information. [3] Courts have ruled that judicial notice must be taken of federal public laws and treaties, state public laws, and official regulations of both ...
A widely used artificial food dye could soon be outlawed. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is moving to ban an artificial food coloring called Red No. 3, also known as Erythrosine. The ...
Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the prosecution's failure to inform the jury that a witness had been promised not to be prosecuted in exchange for his testimony was a failure to fulfill the duty to present all material evidence to the jury, and constituted a violation of due process, requiring a new trial. [1]